Budgeting process in tourism companies for the purpose of improving the quality of tourism products
Budgeting process in tourism companies for the purpose of improving the quality of tourism products
Autori:
Izdanje: SITCON 2016 - Singidunum International Tourism Conference
DOI: 10.15308/Sitcon-2016-181-186
Oblast: Tourism
Stranice: 181-186
Apstrakt:
Deciding on a travel agency’s budget is a highly complex task. Budgeting process
in the travel agency is directly linked to the planning process, which needs to
improve the decision-making process through formalization of the planning
process. Travel agency’s objectives and methods for meeting those objectives
are defined in the planning process, starting from the internal and external
factors that are of particular importance when making a series of decisions in
the process of strategic and operational planning. When formulating general
budget, the rational aspect of decision-making predominates when it comes
to the quality improvement of a tourism product, although other decisionmaking
aspects are implemented by an agency in accordance with its financial
and human resources, and time as a resource, should not be ignored. Scientific
decision-making requires greater financial resources. There is also intuitive
decision making in case the agency performs an independent assessment of
the market, relying on its previous business experience. In the final phase of
the general budget formulation, new decisions are made based on the budgeted
balance sheet, which determines further business policy of the agency,
no matter if the proposed budget will be accepted or revised.
in the travel agency is directly linked to the planning process, which needs to
improve the decision-making process through formalization of the planning
process. Travel agency’s objectives and methods for meeting those objectives
are defined in the planning process, starting from the internal and external
factors that are of particular importance when making a series of decisions in
the process of strategic and operational planning. When formulating general
budget, the rational aspect of decision-making predominates when it comes
to the quality improvement of a tourism product, although other decisionmaking
aspects are implemented by an agency in accordance with its financial
and human resources, and time as a resource, should not be ignored. Scientific
decision-making requires greater financial resources. There is also intuitive
decision making in case the agency performs an independent assessment of
the market, relying on its previous business experience. In the final phase of
the general budget formulation, new decisions are made based on the budgeted
balance sheet, which determines further business policy of the agency,
no matter if the proposed budget will be accepted or revised.
Ključne reči: budgeting, planning, quality improvement, general budget, management
Priložene datoteke:
- 181-186 ( veličina: 405,43 KB, broj pregleda: 5597 )
Kategorije objave:
Radovi na konferenciji SITCON 2016, Beograd, Serbija
Zahvaljujemo se što ste preuzeli publikaciju sa portala Singipedia.
Ukoliko želite da se prijavite za obaveštenja o sadržajima iz oblasti ove publikacije, možete nam ostaviti adresu svoje elektronske pošte.
Preuzimanje citata:
BibTeX format
RefWorks Tagged format
Unapred formatirani prikaz citata
BibTeX format
@article{article, author = {D. Vuković}, title = {Budgeting process in tourism companies for the purpose of improving the quality of tourism products}, journal = {SITCON 2016 - Singidunum International Tourism Conference}, year = 2016, pages = {181-186}, doi = {10.15308/Sitcon-2016-181-186} }
RT Conference Proceedings A1 Danica Vuković T1 Budgeting process in tourism companies for the purpose of improving the quality of tourism products AD Univerzitet Singidunum, Beograd, Beograd, Srbija YR 2016 NO doi: 10.15308/Sitcon-2016-181-186
D. Vuković, Budgeting process in tourism companies for the purpose of improving the quality of tourism products, Univerzitet Singidunum, Beograd, 2016, doi:10.15308/Sitcon-2016-181-186